How Content Tagging Ends Proposal AI Chaos
Content tagging is one of the fastest ways to make AI useful in your knowledge base without letting it “choose” what to trust, what to ignore, or what to invent. In proposal environments where a single incorrect past performance detail can cost a win, content tagging helps steer AI and machine learning toward accurate, compliant, reusable answers rather than bias or hallucination.
Most teams want AI to help with capture planning, proposal drafting, and reuse by pulling data from standard repositories to answer questions like:
- “What’s our strongest relevant past performance for this requirement?”
- “Which resumes match this labor category?”
- “Do we have a compliant boilerplate for Section L?”
If your content is unstructured and unlabeled, AI must guess what’s relevant. That guesswork increases the odds of pulling outdated content, mixing customers, misquoting contract values, or repeating language that is no longer compliant. Content tagging replaces guesswork with guidance.
Benefits of Content Tagging
When you implement content tagging, you’re not just organizing files; you’re shaping how AI retrieves, ranks, and explains information.
- Faster, cleaner retrieval for proposal reuse: Tagged content enables AI (and humans) to quickly filter by customer, agency, NAICS, contract type, period of performance, and clearance level.
- Less hallucination, fewer “creative” assumptions: AI is far less likely to invent details when the knowledge base has clear signals like “approved” or “current.”
- Better governance and compliance: Content tagging supports rules such as “Use only approved boilerplate,” “exclude proprietary partner content,” or “do not use draft language in proposal development.”
- Higher-quality search and better machine learning outcomes: Machine learning thrives on labeled data. When you tag consistently, you improve clustering, recommendations, duplicate detection, and future automation.
- Easier handoffs across capture, proposal, and delivery teams: Tagged assets reduce tribal knowledge. New team members can find the right resume, case study, or compliance matrix without guessing which folder is the source of truth.
What Happens when Data Isn’t Tagged?
If you skip content tagging, AI will still respond, but the risk shifts to you.
- Hallucination risk: AI may “fill in” missing context (e.g., contract values, dates, scope) when it can’t reliably locate authoritative fields.
- Bias: AI can apply more weight to content that is longer, more recent, or written more confidently, even if it’s wrong or irrelevant.
- Stale content: Old resumes, outdated rate sheets, or retired boilerplate can appear because nothing marks them as inactive.
- Cross-customer contamination: Similar projects can get blended, accidentally mixing customer names, metrics, or performance outcomes.
- Wasted time: Proposal teams spend hours validating “AI answers” because the knowledge base didn’t provide enough structure to trust retrieval.
In short, without content tagging, you get speed without certainty, but proposal work demands both.
How to Implement a Tagging Architecture
Create a use case before tagging to control how AI searches and retrieves trusted data. Without a use case, tagging almost always becomes inconsistent and expensive. For example, when staff members start tagging files or documents without a standard architecture, synonyms proliferate (“cyber,” “cybersecurity,” “infosec”), tags drift from the original business meaning, and no one knows which tags matter.
Work with your team (executives, capture and proposal team members, database administrators, and cybersecurity officers) to develop a consistent tagging architecture. When creating your tagging plan, consider these elements:
- Scope and objectives – what decisions will tags improve?
- Personas and workflow – identify main actors and their responsibilities
- Common problem and solution statements, such as time spent searching vs. writing
- Tagging categories and taxonomy – client, contract vehicle, solution domain, etc.
- Governance and quality controls – ownership, change and quality controls, training
- Security permissions – access constraints, auditability, legal holds, retention
- Integration with AI search and retrieval behavior – tags as filters, ranking boosters
- Success metrics – search time, retrieval precision, reuse rate, tag accuracy
- Risks – tagging burden, taxonomy sprawl, adoption resistance, etc.
- Roll out and phased implementation timeline
You don’t need 50 tags. Start with a small set that directly supports reuse and compliance:
- Customer, agency, and bureau
- Solution area (e.g., cybersecurity, data analytics, AI)
- Contract vehicle name or type (e.g., IDIQ, BPA, task order, FF, T&M)
- NAICS or PSC code
- Security level or export control type
- Status (e.g., draft, approved, used, or archived)
- Owner (content owner or manager)
- Last validated date
- Use constraints (e.g., internal only, proprietary, public releasable)
This kind of content tagging makes AI retrieval safer because it can be instructed to prioritize “approved + validated within the last 12 months + same customer.”
How to Tag Files
Your company’s file repository will dictate how you can tag files. Some companies have invested in databases integrated with AI capabilities, such as Responsive (formerly RFIO), and can use built-in capabilities to facilitate tagging and file organization. Many other companies rely on tools such as Microsoft SharePoint, integrated with Teams or CoPilot, which require manual intervention.
AI systems that search SharePoint, including Teams, Microsoft Search, CoPilot, and other third-party tools, rely on file-level metadata and tags as their primary signal. These signals include SharePoint columns, file properties, sensitivity labels, and content types. AI will also conduct full-text searches inside documents as a secondary signal. However, AI doesn’t retrieve data from alt text embedded in a document or from visible labels on images. So, if a human can’t filter it in, AI can’t reliably retrieve it either.
If you are using Microsoft SharePoint, you can tag files (with permission) using the Add Column feature. If you don’t see this feature, you’ll need to request permission from your administrator.
- Go to a document library in SharePoint
- Click the Add Column field
- Choose the column type (either managed metadata (customer, solution area, capability) or choice for small lists like document types, approved yes/no)
- Name the column clearly with short, obvious names
- Save the column
- Click on a file and tag it using the “add column” filters you just created
- Verify that the new columns you added are visible in the file grid view
- Test your capability to filter on tags and search your file repository
- Train users how to conduct AI searches using tag filters
Conclusion
If you want AI to accelerate capture and proposal work, you must shape the knowledge base it draws from. Content tagging is how you reduce bias, prevent hallucination, and keep reuse compliant, especially in high-stakes proposal environments. If you want to learn more about using AI and GenAI to automate proposal operations, contact Lohfeld Consulting.
Relevant Information
By Brenda Crist, Vice President at Lohfeld Consulting Group, MPA, CPP APMP Fellow
Lohfeld Consulting Group has proven results specializing in helping companies create winning captures and proposals. As the premier capture and proposal services consulting firm focused exclusively on government markets, we provide expert assistance to government contractors in Capture Planning and Strategy, Proposal Management and Writing, Capture and Proposal Process and Infrastructure, and Training. In the last 3 years, we’ve supported over 550 proposals winning more than $170B for our clients—including the Top 10 government contractors. Lohfeld Consulting Group is your “go-to” capture and proposal source! Start winning by contacting us at www.lohfeldconsulting.com and join us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube(TM).
Paperback or Kindle
10 steps to creating high-scoring proposals
by Bob Lohfeld
contributors Edited by Beth Wingate
Subscribe to our free ebrief
Teaming friends, frenemies, and enemies—12 tips to mitigate harmful effects
Did you know that contracting officers spend up to 20% of their time mitigating disputes between teaming partners? In an informal poll we conducted on LinkedIn last month, 40% of respondents classified their teaming partners as “frenemies” on their last bid.
Explore Further
- Advice (539)
- AI (30)
- APMP (18)
- Army MAPS Contracts (3)
- Business Development (294)
- Capture Management (266)
- Complex Technology Grants Services (26)
- Favorite Books (5)
- GenAI (4)
- Go-to-Market (27)
- Graphics (5)
- Lohfeld Books (2)
- NASA SEWP VI Contracts (2)
- Navy SeaPort-NxG Contracts (2)
- NIST MSE Grants (1)
- NIST NAPMP Grants (2)
- Past Performance (63)
- Post-submission Phase (14)
- Pre-RFP Preparation (264)
- Proposal Management (341)
- Proposal Production (77)
- Proposal Reviews (40)
- Proposal Writing (109)
- Pursuit Phase (108)
- Research Report (4)
- Resources (63)
- Tools & Tips (423)
- Training (13)
- Uncategorized (223)

Sign Up for INSIGHTS and Download your FREE book
We'd love to help you with your proposals. Enjoy our complimentary Lohfeld Consulting Group Capture & Proposal Insights & Tips book with your FREE subscription to our Insights Newsletter.
GET YOUR FREE BOOK