Are You Ready for the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) IEP 2.0 Bid?
Facts At-a-Glance
Topic | Description |
Name | Integrated Enterprise Portals (IEP 2.0) |
Agency | Internal Revenue Service (IRS) |
Period of performance | 8 years |
Industry day | June 13, 2023 |
Request for Proposal (RFP) | November 2023 (estimate) |
Value | $1.7B per the Industry Day |
Contract type | Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) |
NAICS | 541512 Computer Systems Design Services |
Competition type | Per the Industry Day Q&A, IRS indicated it was still in the market research phase; therefore, the requirement does not yet contain a small business (SB) set aside. However, based on its current market research, IRS expects to include SB subcontracting goals. |
Competition vehicle | GSA Schedule IT-70 |
Number of winners | Single award |
Award date | April 2024 |
Incumbents | TIRNO17D00004, Accenture Federal Services |
List of interested vendors | Published in the Industry Day Q&A document |
IEP 2.0 Overview
The IEP is the front door to the IRS Enterprise systems/applications for users and plays a mission-critical role in serving taxpayers, tax preparers, and employees. IRS awarded the current IEP contract in 2017 as an 8-year contract with a $1.017B ceiling. The current IEP contractor provides a range of application development, hosting, security, and operations services for 90+ IRS business applications. Some of the IEP-hosted applications are mission-critical to the IRS and essential for delivering a successful filing season.
For IEP 2.0, the IRS seeks a qualified Managed Service Provider (MSP) to deliver, operate, and manage the IEP services. The IRS also requires the contractor to evolve IEP services, as IRS needs change. To accomplish these goals, the new IEP MSP contract must provide secure application hosting services and deliver the services using fully scalable, virtualized environments and cloud services that are dedicated to the IRS.
IEP resides on a virtualized hybrid cloud platform that is scalable, managed privately, and dedicated to the IRS for internal and external users. The platform supports a variety of performance and availability requirements with more than 99.99% availability and sub-second responses, even in the event of an unexpected disaster during peak tax season.
Table 1 summarizes the breadth of IEP 2.0 requirements.
Table 1: IEP 2.0 Performance Work Statement (PWS) from Modification #1 Dated June 12, 2023
Draft RFP Reference | Description |
C.3.1 | IEP Service and Program Integration Services |
C.3.1.1 | Program Management |
C.3.1.2 | Service Delivery |
C.3.1.3 | Service Integration Work Request Support |
C.3.1.4 | Support for IRS Enhanced Activities |
C.3.2 | IEP Infrastructure Services |
C.3.2.1 | Foundation |
C.3.2.2 | Reliability |
C.3.2.3 | Operation |
C.3.2.4 | Performance |
C.3.2.5 | Infrastructure Work Request Support |
C.3.3 | IEP Application Hosting Services |
C.3.3.1 | Application Hosting Support |
C.3.3.2 | Capacity Management |
C.3.3.3 | Incident Management |
C.3.3.4 | Problem Management |
C.3.3.5 | Monitoring |
C.3.3.6 | Application Infrastructure Integration Services (AIIS) |
C.3.3.7 | Configuration and Change Management |
C.3.3.8 | Service Catalog |
C.3.3.9 | Service Desk |
C.3.3.10 | Hosting Work Request Support |
C.3.4 | IEP Security Services |
C.3.4.1 | Security Risk Management Framework |
C.3.4.2 | Patch and Vulnerability Management |
C.3.4.3 | Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) |
C.3.4.4 | Security Continuous Monitoring |
C.3.4.5 | Security Configuration and Change Management |
C.3.4.6 | Security Audit |
C.3.4.7 | Incident Handling |
C.3.4.8 | Business Continuity |
C.3.4.9 | Security Control Assessment and Contractor Security Assessment |
C.3.4.10 | Defensive Cyber Operations |
C.3.4.11 | Portal Applications Security |
C.3.4.12 | Security Policy |
C.3.4.13 | Security Work Request Support |
C.3.5 | IEP Application Services |
C.3.5.1 | Application Engineering Support Services |
C.3.5.2 | Web User Analysis Data Collection and Analytics |
C.3.5.3 | Application Infrastructure Services |
C.3.5.4 | Application Work Request Support |
C.3.6 | Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Cloud Services |
C.3.7 | IEP Transition Services |
C.3.7.1 | IEP 2.0 Operational Transition |
C.3.7.2 | Transition from IEP 2.0 Operations |
C.3.7.3 | Transition Work Request Support |
Timeline
Table 2 contains the estimated timeline for the RFP release and award.
Table 2: Timeline
Date | Activity |
05/18/2023 | Presolicitation |
06/07/2023 | Draft |
06/07/2023 | Sources Sought/RFI/Market Research |
06/12/2023 | Draft |
06/13/2023 | Industry Day/Site Visit/Conference |
06/30/2023 | Responses |
11/2024 | RFP Release (estimate) |
04/2024 | Award Date (estimate) |
Cost and Challenges to Bid
IRS’ draft PWS does not contain instructions. However, the previous IEP RFP required a high level of effort to produce a response. Offerors had to pass the “go/no go” down-select process before they could move onto step 2, which required them to:
- Have an Earned Value Management System (EVMS)
- Have a Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)-SW Level 3 certification
- Submit a pledge that all work is performed in the United States
- Have relevant corporate experience providing managed web portal services
Companies who survived the “go/no go” decision were given the opportunity to write an 8-volume proposal consisting of 250+ pages. These volumes covered the offeror’s technical, management, and transition approaches, their relevant experience and past performance, their small business participation and utilization plans, and their business and price proposals.
Developing the IEP 2.0 proposal will come with challenges. IEP 2.0 challenges the capture managers to acquire the best information to support solution development and pricing. IEP 2.0 challenges solution architects to create a solution that provides all labor, hardware, software, equipment, materials, communications, facilities, and IT infrastructure to deliver a transition that doesn’t interrupt ongoing operations. IEP 2.0 challenges proposal managers to manage the development of a high-scoring proposal using a large team of stakeholders across multiple proposal volumes.
Evaluation Criteria Summary
The IRS has not provided draft evaluation criteria for IEP 2.0 yet. However, on IEP (the current contract), we know IRS evaluated proposals using a two-step process. In step one, IRS eliminated proposals that did not meet its “go/no go” requirements. Those companies surviving step one could submit proposals aligned with the factors and evaluation criteria summarized in Table 3. IRS rated proposals on significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies for each evaluated factor.
Table 3 Summary of Evaluation Factors
Factor | Evaluation Criteria Summary |
Factor 1 – Technical Approach | A clear understanding of the PWS principal work areasA technical approach to satisfying the capabilities, requirements, constraints, performance objectives, performance measurements, and performance standards detailed in the PWSProposed technological innovationsHow the offeror addressed ownership, usage rights, and documentation transfer to the IRS or a subsequent party |
Factor 2 – Management Approach | Demonstrated experience with project management disciplines and ability to optimize IEP’s operationsOrganizational structure and approval processesCommunications, risk, and subcontractor processesQuality Assurance PlanKey Personnel resumes |
Factor 3 – Transition Approach | Ability to provide uninterrupted support at acceptable performance levels while assuming responsibilityProposed Transition Plan approach, schedule, organization, personnel, activities, and risks |
Factor 4 – Relevant Experience | Experience with working on projects of similar size, scope, magnitude, and complexity as outlined in the PWS |
Factor 5 – Past Performance | Recency, relevance, and performance of work |
Factor 6 – Price | IRS evaluated offerors’ price rates and other direct costs to ensure they were complete, reasonable, and balanced |
By Brenda Crist, Vice President at Lohfeld Consulting Group, MPA, CPP APMP Fellow
Lohfeld Consulting Group has proven results specializing in helping companies create winning captures and proposals. As the premier capture and proposal services consulting firm focused exclusively on government markets, we provide expert assistance to government contractors in Capture Planning and Strategy, Proposal Management and Writing, Capture and Proposal Process and Infrastructure, and Training. In the last 3 years, we’ve supported over 550 proposals winning more than $170B for our clients—including the Top 10 government contractors. Lohfeld Consulting Group is your “go-to” capture and proposal source! Start winning by contacting us at www.lohfeldconsulting.com and join us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.
Paperback or Kindle
10 steps to creating high-scoring proposals
by Bob Lohfeld
contributors Edited by Beth Wingate
Subscribe to our free ebrief
Teaming friends, frenemies, and enemies—12 tips to mitigate harmful effects
Did you know that contracting officers spend up to 20% of their time mitigating disputes between teaming partners? In an informal poll we conducted on LinkedIn last month, 40% of respondents classified their teaming partners as “frenemies” on their last bid.
Explore Further
- Advice (492)
- AI (15)
- APMP (17)
- Business Development (227)
- Capture Management (205)
- Complex Technology Grants Services (10)
- Favorite Books (5)
- Go-to-Market (27)
- Graphics (5)
- Lohfeld Books (2)
- Past Performance (59)
- Post-submission Phase (14)
- Pre-RFP Preparation (216)
- Proposal Management (287)
- Proposal Production (65)
- Proposal Reviews (29)
- Proposal Writing (88)
- Pursuit Phase (90)
- Research Report (2)
- Resources (59)
- Tools & Tips (314)
- Training (10)
- Uncategorized (218)
Sign Up for INSIGHTS and Download your FREE book
We'd love to help you with your proposals. Enjoy our complimentary Lohfeld Consulting Group Capture & Proposal Insights & Tips book with your FREE subscription to our Insights Newsletter.
GET YOUR FREE BOOK